Article: 1013 of sgi.talk.ratical
From: (dave "who can do? ratmandu!" ratcliffe)
Subject: Krishnamurti on Effort, observing what is
Summary: celebrating the conclusion of my 38th revolution around Sol
Keywords: conflict, effort, fragmentation, observation, consider not becoming
Organization: Silicon Graphics, Inc.
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 1993 14:44:55 GMT
Lines: 285


     . . . effort is a strife or a struggle to transform that which is
     into something which you wish it to be. I am only talking about
     psychological struggle, not the struggle with a physical problem,
     like engineering or some discovery or transformation which is
     purely technical. I am only talking of that struggle which is
     psychological and which always overcomes the technical. You may
     build with great care a marvellous society, using the infinite
     knowledge science has given us. But so long as the psychological
     strife and struggle and battle are not understood and the
     psychological overtones and currents are not overcome, the
     structure of society, however marvellously built, is bound to
     crash, as has happened over and over again.

     Effort is a distraction from what is. The moment I accept what is
     there is no struggle. Any form of struggle or strife is an
     indication of distraction; and distraction, which is effort, must
     exist so long as psychologically I wish to transform what is into
     something it is not.

     . . . It is only if you are aware of inward insufficiency and live
     with it without escape, accepting it wholly, that you will
     discover an extraordinary tranquillity, a tranquillity which is
     not put together, made up, but a tranquillity which comes with
     understanding of what is.


celebrating at 4:26 this aft, the conclusion of my 38th revolution around
Sol. the sanskrit meaning of the word "mantra" is, `consider not becoming.'
as human beings, we are tremendously conditioned to always be striving
towards some goal. to become other than what we are now. the only state of
being we ever actually know is right now, this moment. but how fervently we
continuously are "elsewhere" than this moment, than the now. Krishnamurti
discusses at great length, "observe what is." sounds extraordinarily simple.
and yet how unfamiliar we are with the actuality of such being. to observe
the fact of what is, free from our own opinions, judgement, bias, free from
condemnation, resistance, approval--to simply observe the actuality of what
is--in such self-awareness begins true intelligence. existence is infinite.
to think is to abstract. but the totality of existence is NOT an
abstraction! we confine ourselves to a limited, hence fragmentary
understanding of this when we attempt to live life wholly through the
process of thought, of the intellect, as if this alone possessed closure:


     It is important to understand from the very beginning that I am
     not formulating any philosophy or any theological structure of
     ideas or theological concepts. It seems to me that all ideologies
     are utterly idiotic. What is important is not a philosophy of life
     but to observe what is actually taking place in our daily life,
     inwardly and outwardly. If you observe very closely what is taking
     place and examine it, you will see that it is based on an
     intellectual conception, and the intellect is not the whole field
     of existence; it is a fragment, and a fragment, however cleverly
     put together, however ancient and traditional, is still a small
     part of existence whereas we have to deal with the totality of
     life. And when we look at what is taking place in the world we
     begin to understand that there is no outer and inner process;
     there is only one unitary process, it is a whole, total movement,
     the inner movement expressing itself as the outer and the outer
     reacting again on the inner. To be able to look at this seems to
     me all that is needed, because if we know how to look, then the
     whole thing becomes very clear, and to look needs no philosophy,
     no teacher. Nobody need tell you how to look. You just look.

     Can you then, seeing this whole picture, seeing it not verbally
     but actually, can you easily, spontaneously, transform yourself?
     That is the real issue. Is it possible to bring about a complete
     revolution in the psyche? . . .

     If I were foolish enough to give you a system and if you were
     foolish enough to follow it, you would merely be copying,
     imitating, conforming, accepting, and when you do that you have
     set up in yourself the authority of another and hence there is
     conflict between you and that authority. You feel you must do such
     and such a thing because you have been told to do it and yet you
     are incapable of doing it. You have your own particular
     inclinations, tendencies and pressures which conflict with the
     system you think you ought to follow and therefore there is a
     contradiction. So you will lead a double life between the ideology
     of the system and the actuality of your daily existence. In trying
     to conform to the ideology, you suppress yourself--whereas what is
     actually true is not the ideology but what you are. If you try to
     study yourself according to another you will always remain a
     secondhand human being. . . .

     So you see that you cannot depend on anybody. There is no guide,
     no teacher, no authority. There is only you--your relationship to
     others and with the world--there is nothing else. When you realise
     this, it either brings great despair, from which comes cynicism
     and bitterness, or, in facing the fact that you and nobody else
     are responsible for the world and for yourself, for what you
     think, what you feel, how you act, all self-pity goes. Normally we
     thrive on blaming others, which is a form of self-pity.

         -- Krishnamurti, Freedom From The Known, 1969, pp. 15, 16, 17


consider not becoming. consider yourself as you are now--not as you hope to
be "later," not as you "will be"--but simply as you are in this moment.
anything else but what we are NOW is illusion. this moment is all any of us
ever have. how curious to see the mechanism of escape from this
totality--that we are so conditioned to be anywhere else but actually and
totally in this, the present, and only, moment.

                                                             --ratitor dave



   from The First And Last Freedom, by J. Krishnamurti, 1954, pp. 66-70:
  ------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                CHAPTER VII

                                   EFFORT

     FOR MOST OF US, our whole life is based on effort, some kind of
     volition. We cannot conceive of an action without volition,
     without effort; our life is based on it. Our social, economic and
     so-called spiritual life is a series of efforts, always
     culminating in a certain result. And we think effort is essential,
     necessary.

     Why do we make effort? Is it not, put simply, in order to achieve
     a result, to become something, to reach a goal? If we do not make
     an effort, we think we shall stagnate. We have an idea about the
     goal towards which we are constantly striving; and this striving
     has become part of our life. If we want to alter ourselves, if we
     want to bring about a radical change in ourselves, we make a
     tremendous effort to eliminate the old habits, to resist the
     habitual environmental influences and so on. So we are used to
     this series of efforts in order to find or achieve something, in
     order to live at all.

     Is not all such effort the activity of the self? Is not effort
     self-centred activity? If we make an effort from the centre of the
     self, it must inevitably produce more conflict, more confusion,
     more misery. Yet we keep on making effort after effort. Very few
     of us realize that the self-centred activity of effort does not
     clear up any of our problems. On the contrary, it increases our
     confusion and our misery and our sorrow. We know this; and yet we
     continue hoping somehow to break through this self-centred
     activity of effort, the action of the will.

     I think we shall understand the significance of life, if we
     understand what it means to make an effort. Does happiness come
     through effort? Have you ever tried to be happy? It is impossible,
     is it not? You struggle to be happy and there is no happiness, is
     there? Joy does not come through suppression, through control or
     indulgence. You may indulge but there is bitterness at the end.
     You may suppress or control, but there is always strife in the
     hidden. Therefore happiness does not come through effort, nor joy
     through control and suppression; and still all our life is a
     series of suppressions, a series of controls, a series of
     regretful indulgences. Also there is a constant overcoming, a
     constant struggle with our passions, our greed and our stupidity.
     So do we not strive, struggle, make effort, in the hope of finding
     happiness, finding something which will give us a feeling of
     peace, a sense of love? Yet does love or understanding come by
     strife? I think it is very important to understand what we mean by
     struggle, strife or effort.

     Does not effort mean a struggle to change what is into what is
     not, or into what it should be or should become? That is we are
     constantly struggling to avoid facing what is, or we are trying to
     get away from it or to transform or modify what is. A man who is
     truly content is the man who understands what is, gives the right
     significance to what is. That is true contentment; it is not
     concerned with having few or many possessions but with the
     understanding of the whole significance of what is; and that can
     only come when you recognize what is, when you are aware of it,
     not when you are trying to modify it or change it.

     So we see that effort is a strife or a struggle to transform that
     which is into something which you wish it to be. I am only talking
     about psychological struggle, not the struggle with a physical
     problem, like engineering or some discovery or transformation
     which is purely technical. I am only talking of that struggle
     which is psychological and which always overcomes the technical.
     You may build with great care a marvellous society, using the
     infinite knowledge science has given us. But so long as the
     psychological strife and struggle and battle are not understood
     and the psychological overtones and currents are not overcome, the
     structure of society, however marvellously built, is bound to
     crash, as has happened over and over again.

     Effort is a distraction from what is. The moment I accept what is
     there is no struggle. Any form of struggle or strife is an
     indication of distraction; and distraction, which is effort, must
     exist so long as psychologically I wish to transform what is into
     something it is not.

     First we must be free to see that joy and happiness do not come
     through effort. Is creation through effort, or is there creation
     only with the cessation of effort? When do you write, paint or
     sing? When do you create? Surely when there is no effort, when you
     are completely open, when on all levels you are in complete
     communication, completely integrated. Then there is joy and then
     you begin to sing or write a poem or paint or fashion something.
     The moment of creation is not born of struggle.

     Perhaps in understanding the question of creativeness we shall be
     able to understand what we mean by effort. Is creativeness the
     outcome of effort, and are we aware in those moments when we are
     creative? Or is creativeness a sense of total self-forgetfulness,
     that sense when there is no turmoil, when one is wholly unaware of
     the movement of thought, when there is only a complete, full, rich
     being? Is that state the result of travail, of struggle, of
     conflict, of effort? I do not know if you have ever noticed that
     when you do something easily, swiftly, there is no effort, there
     is complete absence of struggle; but as our lives are mostly a
     series of battles, conflicts and struggles, we cannot imagine a
     life, a state of being, in which strife has fully ceased.

     To understand the state of being without strife, that state of
     creative existence, surely one must inquire into the whole problem
     of effort. We mean by effort the striving to fulfil oneself, to
     become something, don't we? I am this, and I want to become that;
     I am not that, and I must become that. In becoming `that', there
     is strife, there is battle, conflict, struggle. In this struggle
     we are concerned inevitably with fulfilment through the gaining of
     an end; we seek self-fulfilment in an object, in a person, in an
     idea, and that demands constant battle, struggle, the effort to
     become, to fulfil. So we have taken this effort as inevitable; and
     I wonder if it is inevitable-- this struggle to become something?
     Why is there this struggle? Where there is the desire for
     fulfilment, in whatever degree and at whatever level, there must
     be struggle. Fulfilment is the motive, the drive behind the
     effort; whether it is in the big executive, the housewife, or a
     poor man, there is this battle to become, to fulfil, going on.

     Now why is there the desire to fulfil oneself? Obviously, the
     desire to fulfil, to become something, arises when there is
     awareness of being nothing. Because I am nothing, because I am
     insufficient, empty, inwardly poor, I struggle to become
     something; outwardly or inwardly I struggle to fulfil myself in a
     person, in a thing, in an idea. To fill that void is the whole
     process of our existence. Being aware that we are empty, inwardly
     poor, we struggle either to collect things outwardly, or to
     cultivate inward riches. There is effort only when there is an
     escape from that inward void through action, through
     contemplation, through acquisition, through achievement, through
     power, and so on. That is our daily existence. I am aware of my
     insufficiency, my inward poverty, and I struggle to run away from
     it or to fill it. This running away, avoiding, or trying to cover
     up the void, entails struggle, strife, effort.

     Now if one does not make an effort to run away, what happens? One
     lives with that loneliness, that emptiness; and in accepting that
     emptiness one will find that there comes a creative state which
     has nothing to do with strife, with effort. Effort exists only so
     long as we are trying to avoid that inward loneliness, emptiness,
     but when we look at it, observe it, when we accept what is without
     avoidance, we will find there comes a state of being in which all
     strife ceases. That state of being is creativeness and it is not
     the result of strife.

     But when there is understanding of what is, which is emptiness,
     inward insufficiency, when one lives with that insufficiency and
     understands it fully, there comes creative reality, creative
     intelligence, which alone brings happiness.

     Therefore action as we know it is really reaction, it is a
     ceaseless becoming, which is the denial, the avoidance of what is;
     but when there is awareness of emptiness without choice, without
     condemnation or justification, then in that understanding of what
     is there is action, and this action is creative being. You will
     understand this if you are aware of yourself in action. Observe
     yourself as you are acting, not only outwardly but see also the
     movement of your thought and feeling. When you are aware of this
     movement you will see that the thought process, which is also
     feeling and action, is based on an idea of becoming. The idea of
     becoming arises only when there is a sense of insecurity, and that
     sense of insecurity comes when one is aware of the inward void. If
     you are aware of that process of thought and feeling, you will see
     that there is a constant battle going on, an effort to change, to
     modify, to alter what is. This is the effort to become, and
     becoming is a direct avoidance of what is. Through self-
     knowledge, through constant awareness, you will find that strife,
     battle, the conflict of becoming, leads to pain, to sorrow and
     ignorance. It is only if you are aware of inward insufficiency and
     live with it without escape, accepting it wholly, that you will
     discover an extraordinary tranquillity, a tranquillity which is
     not put together, made up, but a tranquillity which comes with
     understanding of what is. Only in that state of tranquillity is
     there creative being.



--
     We are always comparing what we are with what we should be. The
     should-be is a projection of what we think we ought to be.
     Contradiction exists when there is comparison, not only with
     something or somebody, but with what you were yesterday, and hence
     there is conflict between what has been and what is. There is what
     is only when there is no comparison at all, and to live with what
     is, is to be peaceful. Then you can give your whole attention
     without any distraction to what is within yourself--whether it be
     despair, ugliness, brutality, fear, anxiety, loneliness--and live
     with it completely; then there is no contradiction and hence no
     conflict.

                        -- Krishnamurti, Freedom From The Known, p. 63