co-globalizing gaia's children's focus on :
|
This thread -- of transnational corpses endeavoring to "own" the fabric of life itself, by manifesting such Biological koyaanisqatsi -- is occurring on the same level of magnitude as the inappropriate exercise of human intelligence with all man-made things nuclear. Learn all about this. Teach everyone you know. Education can stop this inappropriate state of life that calls for another way of living.
Monsanto to own soyabean! by Devinder Sharma, May 2003
The ETC Century; Erosion,
Sept 2001: Note the 53 new papers mirrored from the ISIS site
Towards a New Ethic of Science, Spring 2000
The Organic Revolution in Science, 10/29/99
The Biotechnology Debate has United the World against Corporate Rule, 11/27/99
Genetic Engineering Biotechnology - Challenges and Opportunities, 5/28/99
Why We Should Reject Biotech Patents from TRIPS
No to GMO's -- Civil Society vs Corporate Empire, 9/11/99
An Interview with Pat Mooney, executive director of RAFI Changing the Nature of Nature - An Interview with Martin Teitel
In The Pipeline: Genetically Modified Humans?
by Andy Savage, South Downs EF!, February 1997 Keeping in mind the fact that:
Winning a "Consumer Right To Know" campaign certainly has its merits. But it is not going to resolve the fact that:
|
This table was mirrored from
http://www.sustainability.com/cage/science.html
|
||||||||||
|
That is why this
wonderful team that has come together through the
IFG has taken on the
challenge through the International Forum on Agriculture
to start, not just changing the rules within the
WTO, but starting
to change the paradigm of agriculture. Because
our actions have taught us, it is the extent to which
we are effective in our everyday lives we are effective
in changing the rules of the game.
Vandana Shiva,
IFG Teach-In, 11/26/99
|
Monsanto argues that genetic engineering is necessary if the world's food supply is to keep up with human population growth. If genetically engineered crops were indeed aimed at feeding the hungry, Monsanto and others would be developing seeds that:None of the genetically engineered crops now available or announced has any of these desirable characteristics.
- grow on substandard or marginal soils;
- produce plants containing more high-quality protein, with increased per-acre yield, withing increasing the need for expensive machinery, chemicals, fertilizers, or water;
- favor small farms over large;
- are cheap and freely available; and
- produce crops that feed people, not livestock.
-- "Against The Grain" by Peter Montague,
YES! A Journal of Positive Futures, Summer 1999, pp.46-7
[I]n the final analysis, the growing controversy over the Terminator technology is not simply a matter of the U.S. government doling out gifts to giant corporations and then promoting their business overseas as globalization coups. This technology not only involves the nature of future generations of plants and crops but the very lives of millions of men, women and children, including small U.S. farmers, that the U.S.government purports to care about. Can the profit motive be justification enough for a fundamentally anti-life technology?
Biosafety is ecological safety in the Biotechnology age. It refers to the risks of "biological pollution" posed by genetically engineered organisms. The biotech industry is afraid of biosafety because it creates a responsibility system that ensures that in the case of biological pollution as in other forms of pollution, it should be the polluter who should pay. The industry has tried all means to deny citizens their right to biosafety. . . .
Genetic engineering will not contribute to Third World food security since it has little to do with increasing yields of food. It is related more significantly to traits such as herbicide resistance which allows industry to sell more chemicals. As the Greenpeace report released at the Biosafety negotiations in Montreal revealed, Monsanto's genetically engineered potato seeds sold in Georgia had yields of only one third to one half of that expected, and pushed farmers into debt. Genetic engineering without biosafety will create destitution and hunger in the Third World. The Third World will be the real loser without biosafety, not because of it, as Mr. Carter fears. Those who respect the democratic and environmental rights of citizens and future generations and who would like to see diverse species protected and flourish, should not be afraid of biosafety and should join the global call for a strong biosafety law to protect humans and other species.
Companies are racing to claim patents on genetic materials from all over the world on which they hope to reap large profits -- in order, they argue, to fund research and innovation. But the new technologies raise many new questions of science, law, ethics and economics, and patent and intellectual property laws have not kept up. The World Trade Organisation (WTO) will be under pressure in 1999 from the agricultural biotech industry side to globalise and strengthen patent protection -- while opponents will argue that plant varieties should be excluded and new mechanisms found for sharing the benefits of genetic material with communities and farmers who may have nurtured and used it for generations.
The debate over GM crops and their patents rages around the world, whether on farms or in law courts. Key to its resolution will be people's access to accurate, understandable information, not public relations hype or scaremongering.
"Rather than developing technology that feeds the world, Monsanto uses genetic engineering to stop farmers from replanting seed and further develop their agricultural systems. It has spent US $18000 million to buy a company owning a patent on what has become known as Terminator Technology: seed that can be planted only once and dies in the second generation. The only aim of this technology is to force farmers back to the Monsanto shop every year, and to destroy an age-old practice of local seed saving that forms the basis of food security in our countries." -- Interpress ServiceWe are indebted to Mary Jo Olsen for writing this article, bringing it to our attention, and permitting us to publish it here on rat haus reality. --ratitor See Also: (local copies of articles cited in Terminator Unleashed)
These documents also vividly cover the issue of "horizontal gene transfer" which Dr. Ho views as the main threat from releasing GE plants...threat to world ecology and health. GE processes use bits of viruses and bacteria as "vectors" - they carry the selected genes into the host, (carriers); they assure that they are turned on and stay turned on (promoters), and anti-biotic resistant strains of bacteri are used as markers in the insertion process (markers). These vectors are loaded guns. Read Mae-Wan Ho.
Links to Further Reading