BOOKS :

• Radiation from Medical Procedures in the Pathogenesis of Cancer and Ischemic Heart Disease: Dose-Response Studies with Physicians per 100,000 Population,
  (1999, 699 pages -- updated:   April 24, 2000)
  
  
• Preventing Breast Cancer:
  The Story Of A Major, Proven, Preventable Cause Of This Disease,
  (1996, 424 pages -- COMPLETE:   April 5, 1998)
  
  
• Radiation-Induced Cancer from Low-Dose Exposure: An Independent Analysis,
  (1990, 480 pgs -- updated:   March 12, 1998)
  
  
• Poisoned Power, The Case Against Nuclear Power Plants Before and After Three Mile Island
  (contents of the 1971+1979 printings -- COMPLETE:   December 16, 1998)

2008 :

• CT Heart Scans: Two Warnings from U.S. Medical History
  unabbreviated version
  by Egan O'Connor, editor for the late Prof. John W. Gofman, M.D., Ph.D., July 10, 2008

2007 :

• John W. Gofman, 88; medical physicist warned of the health effects of radiation
  by Thomas H. Maugh II, Los Angeles Times Staff Writer August 28, 2007

2004 :

• Comments upon the “Draft Recommendations
  of the International Commission on Radiological Protection.”
  Submitted to the ICRP by John Gofman and Egan O'Connor, December 26, 2004.

2003 :

• FDA Proposes New X-Ray Regulations: Immense Health Benefits Possible
  --- Unless Naysayers Prevail.
  X-Ray-Induced Diseases, Hormesis, and Medical Ethics.
  March 31, 2003. Testimony submitted to the FDA, by John Gofman and Egan O'Connor

2002 :

• What Are the Main Critiques of the 1999 Study by Gofman,
  after Three Years of Peer-Review?
  Six Critiques of Radiation from Medical Procedures
  in the Causation of Cancer and Ischemic Heart Disease (IHD), November 2002
  
  
• From XaHP: The X-rays and Health Project,
  An educational project of the Committee for Nuclear Responsibility:
  • Making Personal Decisions about X-ray Screening Tests, Such as
    Mammography and CT of the Lung, Colon, Heart, or the Entire Body, May 2002

2001 :

• From XaHP: The X-rays and Health Project,
  An educational project of the Committee for Nuclear Responsibility:
  • Links to Professional Societies, Current to 12 Oct 2001
  • Who Says that Usual X-Ray Doses Can Be Much Lower?, October 2001
  • X-Radiation and Gamma Radiation:
    Comments on Their Nomination as Known Human Carcinogens
    for the Eleventh Report on Carcinogens (RoC), September 11, 2001
  • COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY (CT) X-RAY EXAMS:
    Estimated Doses to Patients, September 2001
  • Breast Cancer: Why Do We Permit So Many Preventable Cases?, June 2001
  • How the Cold War Caused Millions of American Deaths
    Through Medical Practice:
    A Story of Intended and Unintended Consequences, April, 2001
  • X-Ray Dose-Measuring Service for Physicians and Dentists, January 2001
  
  
  
• Solving Energy Shortages without Nuclear Power: Three Easy Rules, April 2001
  
  
• The Causes of Cancer: Is There "Too Much Emphasis on Genes,
  and Not Enough on the Environment?" How to Avoid Some Mistakes, April 2001
  
  
• Key Facts Justifying Opposition to Nuclear Pollution at Any Level: A Brief Letter of Concern,
  February 6, 2001

2000 :

• From XaHP: The X-rays and Health Project,
  An educational project of the Committee for Nuclear Responsibility:
  • Eight Key Points: Your Stake in
    the Patients' Right-to-Know about X-Rays, December 7, 2000
  • A Proposal for Radiologists: How a Specific Consultation Can Become a Major
    Asset for the Practice and for the Community, October 2000
  • Mammography and XaHP (the X-Rays and Health Project):
    Is There Any Conflict? Four Brief Comments, October 2000
  • Do X-Ray Practitioners Give Enough Attention to Minimizing
    the Patients' X-Ray Dosage? Some Opinions, Some Facts, September 2000
  • How X-Ray Doses Vary From One X-Ray Practitioner to Another:
    Nationwide Surveys, September 2000
  • Fear, and the Patients' Right-to-Know: The Viewpoint
    of an Influential Radiologist, Deserving a Public Response, September 2000
  • A Patient's Guide, When X-Rays Are Proposed, September 2000
  • Making the Bay Area a Model for California and the Nation:
    A Guaranteed Way to Reduce Future Cancer-Rates, Fall 2000
  • X-Rays: The Fallacy of the "Day in the Sun" Comparison, February 28, 2000

• A New, Low-Cost Way to Shake a Mistaken Mindset, April 2, 2000
  
  
• Preventing an Exercise in Self-Defeat:
  The Relevance of Medical Radiation to Nuclear Pollution, April 2000
  
  
• Additional Materials Related to Radiation from Medical Procedures (RAMP) :
  • One Easy and Important Step You Can Take
    Toward Avoiding Cancer and Coronary Heart Disease:
    An Affordable Summary of New Evidence about X-Rays, February 2000
  • Are X-Ray Procedures Equivalent, in Extra Radiation Dose, To Taking an Airplane Trip?, February 28, 2000
  • What Is an "Entrance Dose" of X-Rays?, February 2000
  • RAMP Addition-1: "Expectations", February 19, 2000
  • RAMP Addition-2: "Causation", February 25, 2000
  • RAMP Addition-3: "Atherogenic Mutations", March 9, 2000

1999 :

• Letter of Concern, regarding the biological effects of ionizing radiation, May 11, 1999
  
  
• Cancer in the Family: Does Each Case Require More Than One Cause?
  The Likelihood of Co-Action., April 1999

1998 :

• CNR Renewal Request, Fall 1998
  
  
• "Asleep at the Wheel": The Special Menace
  of Inherited Afflictions from Ionizing Radiation, Fall 1998
  
  
• The Fission-Product Equivalence
  between Nuclear Reactors and Nuclear Weapons, Fall 1998
  Adapted from Vol.117, No. 105, July 8, 1971, of the Congressional Record
  
  
• Comments on Extremely Low Frequency Electric and Magnetic Fields, October 2, 1998
  
  
• Mammography: An Individual's Estimated Risk that the
  Examination Itself Will Cause Radiation-Induced Breast Cancer, June 9, 1998
  
  
• Confirmation that Ionizing Radiation Can Induce Genomic Instability:
  What is Genomic Instability, and Why Is It So Important?, Spring 1998

1997 :

• Reject the Policy of Putting Radioactive Scrap-Metal into Commerce, December 1, 1997
  
  
• Cassini Fly-By: Will the "Ceramic" Plutonium Still Be a Cohesive Solid,
  or Will Its Self-Irradiation Have Made It Very Fragile?,
  An Open Inquiry to NASA and DOE, October 23, 1997
  
  
• The Following 3 Pieces Together Comprise The Fall '97 mailing:
  1. Need for "Adversary Science" -- the Cassini Example
  2. Solar-Energy Update: Good News about Solar Energy & Energy-Efficiency
  3. Corrections of Frontline's "Nuclear Reaction"
  
  
  
• The Free-Radical Fallacy about Ionizing Radiation:
  Demonstration That a Popular Claim Is Senseless, October 1997
  
  
• A Wake-Up Call for Everyone Who Dislikes Cancer and Inherited Afflictions, Spring 1997
  
  
• Letter of Protest to KQED President re:
  broadcasting Frontline's "Nuclear Reaction", April 25, 1997
  
  
• Supporting files to the Preventing Breast Cancer book:
  • Breast-Cancer Study
  • Some Reviews and Comments on the Book
  • Breast Cancer-Free Zones: Why Not?
  • Resistance To New Ideas: A Relevant Story from the Past

1996 :

• Answers to Frequently-Asked-Questions about "Radiation", Fall 1996
  
  
• Letters To the Editor -- Unsafe in any dose, March 19, 1996
  
  
• Chernobyl's 10th: Cancer and Nuclear-Age Peace -- Don't Be Deceived, March 9, 1996

1995 :

• What Is Factually Wrong with This Belief:
  "Harm from Low-Dose Radiation Is Just Hypothetical --- Not Proven," Fall 1995
  
  
• Seven Comments on Proposed Radiation "Standards"
  for the Yucca Mountain Rad-Waste Respository, October 1995

1994 :

• The Bonds of Trust vs. Deceit by DOE:
  Some Enduring Measures for Your Health and Safety, Spring 1994

1993 :

• Reflections on "Mission Impossible"
  (30th anniversary of LLNL Biology Programs), November 22, 1993
  
  
• What Is Humanity's Most Harmful Law? The Law of Concentrated Benefit over Diffuse Injury, November 1993
  
  
• Beware the Data Diddlers, by Dr. John Gofman, The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, May 1993
  
  
• Radio-Iodine: From Hanford To Chernobyl . . . And Beyond?, Spring 1993

1992 :

• The Right Livelihood Award, 1992, John Gofman (USA)
  
  
• Bio-Medical "Un-Knowledge" And Nuclear Pollution: A Common-Sense Proposal, December 9, 1992
  
  
• No One Escapes Harm: The Essential Story of In-Utero Irradiation, November 1992
  
  
• Radiation-Inducible Chromosome Injuries:   Some Recent Evidence
  on Major Health Consequences, Spring 1992

1991 :

• "Holocaust" versus "Nothing Happened"
  (IAEA and WHO -tainted Chernobyl Radiation databases), Fall 1991
  

1990 :

• The Greening of Nuclear Power and The De-Regulating of Nuclear Waste:
  Four Key Facts Which Need Attention, November 1990

1989 :

• "For Want of a Nail . . . The Rider Was Lost" :
  A Big Flag of Warning from the Radiation Issue, November, 1989

1988 :

• What About Reviving Nuclear Power?, October, 1988

1981 :

• The Top 10 Pronuclear Arguments . . . Answered, January 1981

1972 :

• Reacting to reactors -- The "peaceful atom": Time for a moratorium, November 1972

SELECTED INTERVIEWS :

• The Patient's Right-To-Know,
  June 2000 Interview With Dr. John Gofman from The Women's Menopausal Network
  
  
• HUMAN RADIATION STUDIES: REMEMBERING THE EARLY YEARS,
  Oral Histories: Dr. John W. Gofman, M.D., Ph.D., DOE, December 20, 1994
  
  
• Gofman on the health effects of radiation: `There is no safe threshold', and `Challenging The Nuclear Establishment', 2-part interview in UCSF's synapse, January 1994
  
  
• A Conversation with John Gofman, Ph.D. '43, California Monthly, April 1993
  
  
• The Plowboy Interview: Dr. John W. Gofman, Nuclear And Antinuclear Scientist, March 1981
  
  
• Curriculum Vitae of Dr. John W. Gofman, M.D., Ph.D.

Also on ratical, see:

• "CHAPTER 4, John W. Gofman, Medical Physicist" from Leslie Freeman's tremendous book,
  Nuclear Witnesses, Insiders Speak Out, 1981
  
  
• Dr. John Gofman, A Nuclear Researcher Who Refuses To Lie About Radiation Dangers,
  NUCLEAR GUARDIANSHIP FORUM, Issue 3, Spring 1994