the OTHER paper
                                                                  Box 11376
                                                           Eugene, OR 97440
                                                                April, 1996

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

                   What about the corporate "good guys?"

                            by Wanda Ballentine

     Corporations aren't all bad. Good people work for corporations and
     want to do good things -- what about them?

     "They're irrelevant," says Richard Grossman, co-founder of the
     Program on Corporations, Law and Democracy (POCLAD). Good people
     with good intentions do work for corporations -- but they're still
     trapped in the corporate culture, in a system where profit is the
     bottom line, the only value.

     If a CEO puts environmental protection ahead of maximizing
     profits, shareholders can sue. Maximizing profit by any means is
     his/her job. Corporate anthropolgist, Jane Ann Morris reports that
     the "I'd like to but" argument is endemic. Corporations hire
     dozens of experts to prove to their employees and the community
     that the best methods are the profit-making methods.

     In the 1980s, 40 states passed "constituency statutes" that
     allowed management to consider factors besides profit maximization
     in decision-making -- factors such as the needs of workers, the
     community, and the environment. But the purpose was not to serve
     these interests, but to combat hostile takeovers. Since the
     realization that they could be used for such salutory purposes,
     they are being repealed.

     Corporations are dictatorships. There is nothing democratic about
     them -- people don't learn about living in a democratic society in
     a corporation. All orders go from the top down. No employee has
     any legal standing or role in decision-making. The top officials
     have no accountability to employees, consumers, or communities,
     and even the stockholders are losing ground.

     Vicious competition can be created as everyone scrambles up the
     ladder of success. Sometimes there are factions; sometimes coups;
     sometimes purges. "This," said attorney Greg Kafoury, "is a
     Stalinist model, a totalitarian model -- what does it do to people
     who work there?"

     Kafoury learned what it does from his 15 years working to get the
     Trojan nuclear power plant shut down. Trojan was built on seismic
     cracks that had never been measured. When technology was developed
     to take the measurements, Kafoury asked why the engineer to take
     the measurements and find out how risky they were. "That's a good
     idea!" responded the engineer. . . . "But on the other hand -- why
     should we? We already have our license."

     A lawyer who went to work for a law firm representing big
     corporations reported back to Kafoury dumbfounded. "These guys are
     all macho. They sit around saying things like, `Listen, this next
     project is to put this plant in a small community that spews
     poisons that'll make the kids sick, and goddamit, we need to know
     if you've got what it takes, or are you going to wimp out on us!'
     They pump each other up about how tough they are, how willing `to
     do what's necessary'." This is corporate culture.

     Furthermore, Kafoury noted, CEOs and board members are part of
     interlocking directorates -- they don't just care about what their
     company is doing, but what they're all doing. "If you work for
     them, you have no political life -- you can't write a letter to
     the editor to say `We don't need Hyundai here.' You're a political
     eunuch." And corporation employees who join community groups can
     quash any movement that might threaten corporate activities.

     But corporations donate to many good causes in the community that
     couldn't get along without them. Morris drew what she called a
     "sloppy parallel" between the European colonization of native
     peoples and the corporate colonization of our minds.

     The early contacts between Europeans and indigenous peoples,
     usually involved an exchange of goods -- a reciprocal trade. Both
     sides got something of value and were happy. The trade continued
     on an optional basis.

     Then, the colonizers picked a native trading agent -- ignoring and
     thus undermining tribal lines of authority -- and set him up in a
     trading post, making it easier to get the exotic goods.

     Finally, when dependency on those goods was established and the
     tribes' sustainable skills and habits eroded, prices for native
     goods dropped and/or import prices went up.

     This is also a description of the addictive process.

     Corporate donations, Morris said, follow this pattern. Early
     corporate charters were spelled out on a quid pro quo basis --
     what the corporation would do for the state, what the state would
     do in reciprocity.

     It was not until 1953, when a certain company wanted to make a
     donation to Princeton, that a clear-cut right for corporations to
     make donations to social, civic, religious, organizations was
     established. "This," said Morris, "was similar to appointing a
     trading agent." It gives a company huge influence in community
     decision-making -- influence "far more powerful than a bribe,
     which is a clear one-time reciprocity."

     "Everyone should read business management texts to learn how
     precisely prospective managers are coached to make connections in
     communities so that no one will be untouched, uninfluenced."
     Nearly every organization receives corporate money -- citizens
     must think about this in terms of the colonization experience.

     Kafoury knows the "killing with kindness" method well. A political
     ally of the Stop Trojan campaign was silenced when PG&E kindly
     offered to pay off his campaign debt. Even the Solar Energy
     Association of Oregon, a natural ally, was bought off for $500.

     Then there's the problem of the "experts," said Kafoury. "We are
     spending huge amounts of money in universities and `think tanks'
     to develop expertise, but it's not used for the public good -- its
     for sale." The big money for "experts" is in consulting for
     corporations. When news broke regarding a potential 9-9.5 quake in
     the Northwest, the Stop Trojan committee couldn't find any
     earthquake experts to talk about it. Anyone talking about the real
     risk would be dead as a consultant "even in a situation as
     compelling as an accident that could destroy the Northwest --
     that's how bad it is." said Kafoury. "Carry that through
     everywhere with all the experts."

     Locally, Weyerhaeuser, Georgia Pacific, the Register Guard, among
     others, have pledged to help Food for Lane County with big food
     donations this year. But what are they doing to help develop
     family wage jobs so people don't need hand-outs? What's the spread
     between their CEOs' salaries and those of the average worker?
     Certainly none of them has supported any local labor struggles to
     improve salaries and working conditions, and some have done their
     share of automating and "downsizing."

From the OTHER paper, April, 1996, pg. 7, POB 11376, Eugene, OR 97440.
Subscriptions $15/yr. Reprint permission granted; please cite source.